<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: View Source of HTML Email in Microsoft Outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/2009/04/15/view-source-of-html-email-in-microsoft-outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/2009/04/15/view-source-of-html-email-in-microsoft-outlook/</link>
	<description>God has an awesome plan for your life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/2009/04/15/view-source-of-html-email-in-microsoft-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-3723</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/?p=387#comment-3723</guid>
		<description>Josh, can you honestly tell me that the Victoria&#039;s Secret newsletters you get would be as interesting if they were text-only?

Besides that, HTML emails are the only semi-reliable way to track opens and clicks from your users. Sure you can track clicks in text only emails if you&#039;re willing to have 100-character long links, but who wants to do that? Therefore, when you need to prove ROI to the client, HTML emails are my first choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, can you honestly tell me that the Victoria&#8217;s Secret newsletters you get would be as interesting if they were text-only?</p>
<p>Besides that, HTML emails are the only semi-reliable way to track opens and clicks from your users. Sure you can track clicks in text only emails if you&#8217;re willing to have 100-character long links, but who wants to do that? Therefore, when you need to prove ROI to the client, HTML emails are my first choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/2009/04/15/view-source-of-html-email-in-microsoft-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-3721</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeremyglover.com/blog/?p=387#comment-3721</guid>
		<description>Why would you want to send/recieve HTML email anyways???

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you want to send/recieve HTML email anyways???</p>
<p>()  ascii ribbon campaign &#8211; against html e-mail<br />
/\  <a href="http://www.asciiribbon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.asciiribbon.org</a>   &#8211; against proprietary attachments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
